On average across the year,
yes, Wallis and Futuna is hotter than
South Dakota, United States
.
Wallis and Futuna has an average temperature of 28°C/82°F and South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F.
Wallis and Futuna's hottest month is January, with an average maximum temperature of 32°C/90°F, which is hotter than South Dakota, United States's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, Wallis and Futuna is not colder than South Dakota, United States . Wallis and Futuna has an average minimum temperature of 25°C/77°F and South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Wallis and Futuna has more rain than
South Dakota, United States. Wallis and Futuna has an average annual rainfall of 1695mm and South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm.
Wallis and Futuna's wettest month is February, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than South Dakota, United States's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm).
The midpoint of Wallis and Futuna is approximately 6,333 miles (10,192km) south west of South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Wallis and Futuna is further west than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Wallis and Futuna is further west by approximately 3,929 miles (6,323km).
No, Wallis and Futuna is not further east than South Dakota, United States.
No, Wallis and Futuna is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Wallis and Futuna is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Wallis and Futuna is further south by approximately 4,025 miles (6,478km).
No, Wallis and Futuna is smaller than South Dakota.
Wallis and Futuna has an area of 142 km2 (368 miles2) and South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2)
which means that Wallis and Futuna is 199,587 km2 (516,930 miles2) smaller than South Dakota.
That makes Wallis and Futuna 1,407 times smaller than South Dakota.
Yes, Wallis and Futuna is smaller than South Dakota.
Wallis and Futuna has an area of 142 km2 (368 miles2) and South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2)
which means that Wallis and Futuna is 199,587 km2 (516,930 miles2) smaller than South Dakota.
That makes Wallis and Futuna 1,407 times smaller than South Dakota.
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 6,333 miles (10,192km) north east of Wallis and Futuna.
No, South Dakota, United States is not further west than Wallis and Futuna.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further east than Wallis and Futuna. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 3,929 miles (6,323km).
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Wallis and Futuna. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 4,025 miles (6,478km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Wallis and Futuna.
Yes, South Dakota is bigger than Wallis and Futuna.
South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2) and Wallis and Futuna has an area of 142 km2 (368 miles2)
which means that South Dakota is 199,587 km2 (516,930 miles2) bigger than Wallis and Futuna.
That makes South Dakota 1,407 times bigger than Wallis and Futuna.
No, South Dakota is not smaller than Wallis and Futuna.
South Dakota has an area of 199,729 km2 (517,298 miles2) and Wallis and Futuna has an area of 142 km2 (368 miles2)
which means that South Dakota is 199,587 km2 (516,930 miles2) bigger than Wallis and Futuna.
That makes South Dakota 1,407 times bigger than Wallis and Futuna.
No, Wallis and Futuna is not more populated than South Dakota.
Wallis and Futuna has a population of 15,891 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Wallis and Futuna has 879,485 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Wallis and Futuna 56 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Wallis and Futuna is less populated than South Dakota.
Wallis and Futuna has a population of 15,891 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Wallis and Futuna has 879,485 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Wallis and Futuna 56 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Wallis and Futuna.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Wallis and Futuna has a population of 15,891
which means that South Dakota has 879,485 more people than Wallis and Futuna.
That makes South Dakota 56 times more populated than Wallis and Futuna.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Wallis and Futuna.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Wallis and Futuna has a population of 15,891
which means that South Dakota has 879,485 more people than Wallis and Futuna.
That makes South Dakota 56 times more populated than Wallis and Futuna.