On average across the year,
yes, Zimbabwe is hotter than
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
.
Zimbabwe has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
Zimbabwe's hottest month is October, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is approximately the same temperature as Sioux Falls, South Dakota's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, Zimbabwe is not colder than Sioux Falls, South Dakota . Zimbabwe has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
no, Zimbabwe has less rain than
Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Zimbabwe has an average annual rainfall of 340mm and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 781mm.
Zimbabwe's wettest month is January, with an average monthly rainfall of 85mm, which is drier than Sioux Falls, South Dakota's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 119mm).
The midpoint of Zimbabwe is approximately 8,896 miles (14,316km) south east of Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
No, Zimbabwe is not further west than Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Yes, Zimbabwe is further east than Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The midpoint of Zimbabwe is further east by approximately 5,561 miles (8,950km).
No, Zimbabwe is not further north than Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Yes, Zimbabwe is further south than Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The midpoint of Zimbabwe is further south by approximately 4,323 miles (6,957km).
The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is approximately 8,896 miles (14,316km) north west of Zimbabwe.
Yes, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further west than Zimbabwe. The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further west by approximately 5,561 miles (8,950km).
No, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is not further east than Zimbabwe.
Yes, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further north than Zimbabwe. The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further north by approximately 4,323 miles (6,957km).
No, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is not further south than Zimbabwe.
Yes, Zimbabwe is more populated than Sioux Falls.
Zimbabwe has a population of 15,121,004 and Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544
which means that Zimbabwe has 14,949,460 more people than Sioux Falls.
That makes Zimbabwe 88 times more populated than Sioux Falls.
No, Zimbabwe is not less populated than Sioux Falls.
Zimbabwe has a population of 15,121,004 and Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544
which means that Zimbabwe has 14,949,460 more people than Sioux Falls.
That makes Zimbabwe 88 times more populated than Sioux Falls.
No, Sioux Falls is not more populated than Zimbabwe.
Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544 and Zimbabwe has a population of 15,121,004
which means that Sioux Falls has 14,949,460 fewer people than Zimbabwe.
That makes Sioux Falls 88 times less populated than Zimbabwe.
Yes, Sioux Falls is less populated than Zimbabwe.
Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544 and Zimbabwe has a population of 15,121,004
which means that Sioux Falls has 14,949,460 fewer people than Zimbabwe.
That makes Sioux Falls 88 times less populated than Zimbabwe.