On average across the year,
no, Fresno, California is not hotter than
Rancho Cucamonga, California
.
Fresno, California has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
Fresno, California's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 38°C/100°F, which is hotter than Rancho Cucamonga, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).
On average across the year, yes, Fresno, California is colder than Rancho Cucamonga, California . Fresno, California has an average minimum temperature of 12°C/54°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
no, Fresno, California has less rain than
Rancho Cucamonga, California. Fresno, California has an average annual rainfall of 267mm and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average annual rainfall of 280mm.
Fresno, California's wettest month is January, with an average monthly rainfall of 56mm, which is drier than Rancho Cucamonga, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm).
The midpoint of Fresno, California is approximately 220 miles (354km) north west of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, Fresno, California is further west than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of Fresno, California is further west by approximately 119 miles (192km).
No, Fresno, California is not further east than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, Fresno, California is further north than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of Fresno, California is further north by approximately 183 miles (294km).
No, Fresno, California is not further south than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is approximately 220 miles (354km) south east of Fresno, California.
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further west than Fresno, California.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further east than Fresno, California. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further east by approximately 119 miles (192km).
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further north than Fresno, California.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further south than Fresno, California. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further south by approximately 183 miles (294km).
Yes, Fresno is more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Fresno has a population of 520,052 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that Fresno has 344,816 more people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes Fresno 3 times more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
No, Fresno is not less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Fresno has a population of 520,052 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that Fresno has 344,816 more people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes Fresno 3 times more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
No, Rancho Cucamonga is not more populated than Fresno.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and Fresno has a population of 520,052
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 344,816 fewer people than Fresno.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 3 times less populated than Fresno.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga is less populated than Fresno.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and Fresno has a population of 520,052
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 344,816 fewer people than Fresno.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 3 times less populated than Fresno.