On average across the year,
yes, Illinois, United States is hotter than
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
.
Illinois, United States has an average temperature of 11°C/52°F and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
Illinois, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is approximately the same temperature as Sioux Falls, South Dakota's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, Illinois, United States is not colder than Sioux Falls, South Dakota . Illinois, United States has an average minimum temperature of 6°C/43°F and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Illinois, United States has more rain than
Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Illinois, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1154mm and Sioux Falls, South Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 781mm.
Illinois, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 145mm, which is wetter than Sioux Falls, South Dakota's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 119mm).
The midpoint of Illinois, United States is approximately 425 miles (684km) south east of Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
No, Illinois, United States is not further west than Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Yes, Illinois, United States is further east than Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The midpoint of Illinois, United States is further east by approximately 392 miles (631km).
No, Illinois, United States is not further north than Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Yes, Illinois, United States is further south than Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The midpoint of Illinois, United States is further south by approximately 201 miles (324km).
The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is approximately 425 miles (684km) north west of Illinois, United States.
Yes, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further west than Illinois, United States. The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further west by approximately 392 miles (631km).
No, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is not further east than Illinois, United States.
Yes, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further north than Illinois, United States. The midpoint of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is further north by approximately 201 miles (324km).
No, Sioux Falls, South Dakota is not further south than Illinois, United States.
Yes, Illinois is more populated than Sioux Falls.
Illinois has a population of 12,671,469 and Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544
which means that Illinois has 12,499,925 more people than Sioux Falls.
That makes Illinois 74 times more populated than Sioux Falls.
No, Illinois is not less populated than Sioux Falls.
Illinois has a population of 12,671,469 and Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544
which means that Illinois has 12,499,925 more people than Sioux Falls.
That makes Illinois 74 times more populated than Sioux Falls.
No, Sioux Falls is not more populated than Illinois.
Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544 and Illinois has a population of 12,671,469
which means that Sioux Falls has 12,499,925 fewer people than Illinois.
That makes Sioux Falls 74 times less populated than Illinois.
Yes, Sioux Falls is less populated than Illinois.
Sioux Falls has a population of 171,544 and Illinois has a population of 12,671,469
which means that Sioux Falls has 12,499,925 fewer people than Illinois.
That makes Sioux Falls 74 times less populated than Illinois.