On average across the year,
no, Nebraska, United States is not hotter than
Columbia, South Carolina
.
Nebraska, United States has an average temperature of 11°C/52°F and Columbia, South Carolina has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F.
Nebraska, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is not hotter than Columbia, South Carolina's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 34°C/93°F).
On average across the year, yes, Nebraska, United States is colder than Columbia, South Carolina . Nebraska, United States has an average minimum temperature of 4°C/39°F and Columbia, South Carolina has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
no, Nebraska, United States has less rain than
Columbia, South Carolina. Nebraska, United States has an average annual rainfall of 764mm and Columbia, South Carolina has an average annual rainfall of 1330mm.
Nebraska, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 133mm, which is drier than Columbia, South Carolina's wettest month (July, with an average monthly rainfall of 147mm).
The midpoint of Nebraska, United States is approximately 1,150 miles (1,851km) north west of Columbia, South Carolina.
Yes, Nebraska, United States is further west than Columbia, South Carolina. The midpoint of Nebraska, United States is further west by approximately 919 miles (1,479km).
No, Nebraska, United States is not further east than Columbia, South Carolina.
Yes, Nebraska, United States is further north than Columbia, South Carolina. The midpoint of Nebraska, United States is further north by approximately 518 miles (833km).
No, Nebraska, United States is not further south than Columbia, South Carolina.
The midpoint of Columbia, South Carolina is approximately 1,150 miles (1,851km) south east of Nebraska, United States.
No, Columbia, South Carolina is not further west than Nebraska, United States.
Yes, Columbia, South Carolina is further east than Nebraska, United States. The midpoint of Columbia, South Carolina is further east by approximately 919 miles (1,479km).
No, Columbia, South Carolina is not further north than Nebraska, United States.
Yes, Columbia, South Carolina is further south than Nebraska, United States. The midpoint of Columbia, South Carolina is further south by approximately 518 miles (833km).
Yes, Nebraska is more populated than Columbia.
Nebraska has a population of 1,963,692 and Columbia has a population of 133,803
which means that Nebraska has 1,829,889 more people than Columbia.
That makes Nebraska 15 times more populated than Columbia.
No, Nebraska is not less populated than Columbia.
Nebraska has a population of 1,963,692 and Columbia has a population of 133,803
which means that Nebraska has 1,829,889 more people than Columbia.
That makes Nebraska 15 times more populated than Columbia.
No, Columbia is not more populated than Nebraska.
Columbia has a population of 133,803 and Nebraska has a population of 1,963,692
which means that Columbia has 1,829,889 fewer people than Nebraska.
That makes Columbia 15 times less populated than Nebraska.
Yes, Columbia is less populated than Nebraska.
Columbia has a population of 133,803 and Nebraska has a population of 1,963,692
which means that Columbia has 1,829,889 fewer people than Nebraska.
That makes Columbia 15 times less populated than Nebraska.