On average across the year,
yes, South Carolina, United States is hotter than
Bismarck, North Dakota
.
South Carolina, United States has an average temperature of 18°C/64°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F.
South Carolina, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 33°C/91°F, which is hotter than Bismarck, North Dakota's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, South Carolina, United States is not colder than Bismarck, North Dakota . South Carolina, United States has an average minimum temperature of 12°C/54°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F.
On average across the year,
yes, South Carolina, United States has more rain than
Bismarck, North Dakota. South Carolina, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1365mm and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 515mm.
South Carolina, United States's wettest month is July, with an average monthly rainfall of 149mm, which is wetter than Bismarck, North Dakota's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm).
The midpoint of South Carolina, United States is approximately 1,361 miles (2,191km) south east of Bismarck, North Dakota.
No, South Carolina, United States is not further west than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, South Carolina, United States is further east than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of South Carolina, United States is further east by approximately 1,205 miles (1,939km).
No, South Carolina, United States is not further north than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, South Carolina, United States is further south than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of South Carolina, United States is further south by approximately 896 miles (1,442km).
The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is approximately 1,361 miles (2,191km) north west of South Carolina, United States.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further west than South Carolina, United States. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further west by approximately 1,205 miles (1,939km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further east than South Carolina, United States.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further north than South Carolina, United States. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further north by approximately 896 miles (1,442km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further south than South Carolina, United States.
Yes, South Carolina is more populated than Bismarck.
South Carolina has a population of 5,190,705 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that South Carolina has 5,119,538 more people than Bismarck.
That makes South Carolina 73 times more populated than Bismarck.
No, South Carolina is not less populated than Bismarck.
South Carolina has a population of 5,190,705 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that South Carolina has 5,119,538 more people than Bismarck.
That makes South Carolina 73 times more populated than Bismarck.
No, Bismarck is not more populated than South Carolina.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and South Carolina has a population of 5,190,705
which means that Bismarck has 5,119,538 fewer people than South Carolina.
That makes Bismarck 73 times less populated than South Carolina.
Yes, Bismarck is less populated than South Carolina.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and South Carolina has a population of 5,190,705
which means that Bismarck has 5,119,538 fewer people than South Carolina.
That makes Bismarck 73 times less populated than South Carolina.