On average across the year,
yes, Burbank, California is hotter than
Lancaster, California
.
Burbank, California has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F and Lancaster, California has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F.
Burbank, California's hottest month is August, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Lancaster, California's hottest month (also August, with an average maximum temperature of 33°C/91°F).
On average across the year, no, Burbank, California is not colder than Lancaster, California . Burbank, California has an average minimum temperature of 14°C/57°F and Lancaster, California has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F.
The midpoint of Burbank, California is approximately 37 miles (60km) south of Lancaster, California.
Yes, Burbank, California is further west than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of Burbank, California is further west by approximately 10 miles (16km).
No, Burbank, California is not further east than Lancaster, California.
No, Burbank, California is not further north than Lancaster, California.
Yes, Burbank, California is further south than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of Burbank, California is further south by approximately 36 miles (58km).
The midpoint of Lancaster, California is approximately 37 miles (60km) of Burbank, California.
No, Lancaster, California is not further west than Burbank, California.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further east than Burbank, California. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further east by approximately 10 miles (16km).
Yes, Lancaster, California is further north than Burbank, California. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further north by approximately 36 miles (58km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further south than Burbank, California.
No, Burbank is not more populated than Lancaster.
Burbank has a population of 105,319 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that Burbank has 55,784 fewer people than Lancaster.
That makes Burbank 2 times less populated than Lancaster.
Yes, Burbank is less populated than Lancaster.
Burbank has a population of 105,319 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that Burbank has 55,784 fewer people than Lancaster.
That makes Burbank 2 times less populated than Lancaster.
Yes, Lancaster is more populated than Burbank.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and Burbank has a population of 105,319
which means that Lancaster has 55,784 more people than Burbank.
That makes Lancaster 2 times more populated than Burbank.
No, Lancaster is not less populated than Burbank.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and Burbank has a population of 105,319
which means that Lancaster has 55,784 more people than Burbank.
That makes Lancaster 2 times more populated than Burbank.