Comparing California, United States with Bismarck, North Dakota

Compare Climate information for California, United States and Bismarck, North Dakota

Is California, United States warmer or hotter than Bismarck, North Dakota?

On average across the year, yes, California, United States is hotter than Bismarck, North Dakota . California, United States has an average temperature of 18°C/64°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F.

California, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is approximately the same temperature as Bismarck, North Dakota's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).

Average Monthly Maximum Temperatures
California, United States Bismarck, North Dakota

Is California, United States colder or cooler than Bismarck, North Dakota?

On average across the year, no, California, United States is not colder than Bismarck, North Dakota . California, United States has an average minimum temperature of 12°C/54°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F.



California, United States's coldest month is December, with an average minimum temperature of 6°C/43°F, which is not colder than Bismarck, North Dakota's coldest month (January, with an average minimum temperature of -15°C/5°F).

Average Monthly Minimum Temperatures
California, United States Bismarck, North Dakota

Does California, United States have more rain than Bismarck, North Dakota?

On average across the year, no, California, United States has less rain than Bismarck, North Dakota. California, United States has an average annual rainfall of 261mm and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 515mm.

California, United States's wettest month is December, with an average monthly rainfall of 56mm, which is drier than Bismarck, North Dakota's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm).

Average Monthly Rainfall
California, United States Bismarck, North Dakota

Compare location information for California, United States and Bismarck, North Dakota

How far is California, United States from Bismarck, North Dakota?

The midpoint of California, United States is approximately 1,179 miles (1,897km) south west of Bismarck, North Dakota.

Is California, United States further west than Bismarck, North Dakota?

Yes, California, United States is further west than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of California, United States is further west by approximately 1,096 miles (1,764km).

Is California, United States further east than Bismarck, North Dakota?

No, California, United States is not further east than Bismarck, North Dakota.

Is California, United States further north than Bismarck, North Dakota?

No, California, United States is not further north than Bismarck, North Dakota.

Is California, United States further south than Bismarck, North Dakota?

Yes, California, United States is further south than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of California, United States is further south by approximately 693 miles (1,115km).

How far is Bismarck, North Dakota from California, United States?

The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is approximately 1,179 miles (1,897km) north east of California, United States.

Is Bismarck, North Dakota further west than California, United States?

No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further west than California, United States.

Is Bismarck, North Dakota further east than California, United States?

Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further east than California, United States. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further east by approximately 1,096 miles (1,764km).

Is Bismarck, North Dakota further north than California, United States?

Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further north than California, United States. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further north by approximately 693 miles (1,115km).

Is Bismarck, North Dakota further south than California, United States?

No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further south than California, United States.

Compare population information for California, United States and Bismarck, North Dakota

Is California, United States more populated than Bismarck, North Dakota?

Yes, California is more populated than Bismarck. California has a population of 39,237,836 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167 which means that California has 39,166,669 more people than Bismarck.
That makes California 551 times more populated than Bismarck.

Is California, United States less populated than Bismarck, North Dakota?

No, California is not less populated than Bismarck. California has a population of 39,237,836 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167 which means that California has 39,166,669 more people than Bismarck.
That makes California 551 times more populated than Bismarck.

Is Bismarck, North Dakota more populated than California, United States?

No, Bismarck is not more populated than California. Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and California has a population of 39,237,836 which means that Bismarck has 39,166,669 fewer people than California.
That makes Bismarck 551 times less populated than California.

Is Bismarck, North Dakota less populated than California, United States?

Yes, Bismarck is less populated than California. Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and California has a population of 39,237,836 which means that Bismarck has 39,166,669 fewer people than California.
That makes Bismarck 551 times less populated than California.

Compare California, United States with other countries
Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Ethiopia Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Greenland Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Niger Nigeria North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of the Congo Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda San Marino Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu U.S. Virgin Islands Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vietnam Wallis and Futuna Zimbabwe
Info for other countries
Afghanistan the Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada the Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Ethiopia the Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Greenland Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta the Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Niger Nigeria North Korea North Macedonia the Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of the Congo Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda San Marino Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Slovakia Slovenia the Solomon Islands South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu the U.S. Virgin Islands Ukraine United Arab Emirates the United Kingdom the United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vietnam Wallis and Futuna Zimbabwe