On average across the year,
no, Lubbock, Texas is not hotter than
Wichita Falls, Texas
.
Lubbock, Texas has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F and Wichita Falls, Texas has an average temperature of 18°C/64°F.
Lubbock, Texas's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F, which is not hotter than Wichita Falls, Texas's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 36°C/97°F).
On average across the year, yes, Lubbock, Texas is colder than Wichita Falls, Texas . Lubbock, Texas has an average minimum temperature of 9°C/48°F and Wichita Falls, Texas has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F.
On average across the year,
no, Lubbock, Texas has less rain than
Wichita Falls, Texas. Lubbock, Texas has an average annual rainfall of 479mm and Wichita Falls, Texas has an average annual rainfall of 798mm.
Lubbock, Texas's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 95mm, which is drier than Wichita Falls, Texas's wettest month (also May, with an average monthly rainfall of 134mm).
The midpoint of Lubbock, Texas is approximately 194 miles (313km) west of Wichita Falls, Texas.
Yes, Lubbock, Texas is further west than Wichita Falls, Texas. The midpoint of Lubbock, Texas is further west by approximately 194 miles (312km).
No, Lubbock, Texas is not further east than Wichita Falls, Texas.
No, Lubbock, Texas is not further north than Wichita Falls, Texas.
Yes, Lubbock, Texas is further south than Wichita Falls, Texas. The midpoint of Lubbock, Texas is further south by approximately 23 miles (37km).
The midpoint of Wichita Falls, Texas is approximately 194 miles (313km) east of Lubbock, Texas.
No, Wichita Falls, Texas is not further west than Lubbock, Texas.
Yes, Wichita Falls, Texas is further east than Lubbock, Texas. The midpoint of Wichita Falls, Texas is further east by approximately 194 miles (312km).
Yes, Wichita Falls, Texas is further north than Lubbock, Texas. The midpoint of Wichita Falls, Texas is further north by approximately 23 miles (37km).
No, Wichita Falls, Texas is not further south than Lubbock, Texas.
Yes, Lubbock is more populated than Wichita Falls.
Lubbock has a population of 249,042 and Wichita Falls has a population of 104,710
which means that Lubbock has 144,332 more people than Wichita Falls.
That makes Lubbock 2 times more populated than Wichita Falls.
No, Lubbock is not less populated than Wichita Falls.
Lubbock has a population of 249,042 and Wichita Falls has a population of 104,710
which means that Lubbock has 144,332 more people than Wichita Falls.
That makes Lubbock 2 times more populated than Wichita Falls.
No, Wichita Falls is not more populated than Lubbock.
Wichita Falls has a population of 104,710 and Lubbock has a population of 249,042
which means that Wichita Falls has 144,332 fewer people than Lubbock.
That makes Wichita Falls 2 times less populated than Lubbock.
Yes, Wichita Falls is less populated than Lubbock.
Wichita Falls has a population of 104,710 and Lubbock has a population of 249,042
which means that Wichita Falls has 144,332 fewer people than Lubbock.
That makes Wichita Falls 2 times less populated than Lubbock.