On average across the year,
no, North Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Bakersfield, California
.
North Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 6°C/43°F and Bakersfield, California has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
North Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Bakersfield, California's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 38°C/100°F).
On average across the year, yes, North Dakota, United States is colder than Bakersfield, California . North Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F and Bakersfield, California has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
yes, North Dakota, United States has more rain than
Bakersfield, California. North Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 465mm and Bakersfield, California has an average annual rainfall of 150mm.
North Dakota, United States's wettest month is June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm, which is wetter than Bakersfield, California's wettest month (March, with an average monthly rainfall of 30mm).
The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is approximately 1,251 miles (2,013km) north east of Bakersfield, California.
No, North Dakota, United States is not further west than Bakersfield, California.
Yes, North Dakota, United States is further east than Bakersfield, California. The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 739 miles (1,189km).
Yes, North Dakota, United States is further north than Bakersfield, California. The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 841 miles (1,354km).
No, North Dakota, United States is not further south than Bakersfield, California.
The midpoint of Bakersfield, California is approximately 1,251 miles (2,013km) south west of North Dakota, United States.
Yes, Bakersfield, California is further west than North Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Bakersfield, California is further west by approximately 739 miles (1,189km).
No, Bakersfield, California is not further east than North Dakota, United States.
No, Bakersfield, California is not further north than North Dakota, United States.
Yes, Bakersfield, California is further south than North Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Bakersfield, California is further south by approximately 841 miles (1,354km).
Yes, North Dakota is more populated than Bakersfield.
North Dakota has a population of 774,948 and Bakersfield has a population of 373,640
which means that North Dakota has 401,308 more people than Bakersfield.
That makes North Dakota 2 times more populated than Bakersfield.
No, North Dakota is not less populated than Bakersfield.
North Dakota has a population of 774,948 and Bakersfield has a population of 373,640
which means that North Dakota has 401,308 more people than Bakersfield.
That makes North Dakota 2 times more populated than Bakersfield.
No, Bakersfield is not more populated than North Dakota.
Bakersfield has a population of 373,640 and North Dakota has a population of 774,948
which means that Bakersfield has 401,308 fewer people than North Dakota.
That makes Bakersfield 2 times less populated than North Dakota.
Yes, Bakersfield is less populated than North Dakota.
Bakersfield has a population of 373,640 and North Dakota has a population of 774,948
which means that Bakersfield has 401,308 fewer people than North Dakota.
That makes Bakersfield 2 times less populated than North Dakota.