On average across the year,
no, North Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Chicago, Illinois
.
North Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 6°C/43°F and Chicago, Illinois has an average temperature of 11°C/52°F.
North Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Chicago, Illinois's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, yes, North Dakota, United States is colder than Chicago, Illinois . North Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F and Chicago, Illinois has an average minimum temperature of 7°C/45°F.
On average across the year,
no, North Dakota, United States has less rain than
Chicago, Illinois. North Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 465mm and Chicago, Illinois has an average annual rainfall of 1222mm.
North Dakota, United States's wettest month is June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm, which is drier than Chicago, Illinois's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 162mm).
The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is approximately 764 miles (1,229km) north west of Chicago, Illinois.
Yes, North Dakota, United States is further west than Chicago, Illinois. The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 589 miles (948km).
No, North Dakota, United States is not further east than Chicago, Illinois.
Yes, North Dakota, United States is further north than Chicago, Illinois. The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 394 miles (634km).
No, North Dakota, United States is not further south than Chicago, Illinois.
The midpoint of Chicago, Illinois is approximately 764 miles (1,229km) south east of North Dakota, United States.
No, Chicago, Illinois is not further west than North Dakota, United States.
Yes, Chicago, Illinois is further east than North Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Chicago, Illinois is further east by approximately 589 miles (948km).
No, Chicago, Illinois is not further north than North Dakota, United States.
Yes, Chicago, Illinois is further south than North Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Chicago, Illinois is further south by approximately 394 miles (634km).
No, North Dakota is not more populated than Chicago.
North Dakota has a population of 774,948 and Chicago has a population of 2,720,546
which means that North Dakota has 1,945,598 fewer people than Chicago.
That makes North Dakota 4 times less populated than Chicago.
Yes, North Dakota is less populated than Chicago.
North Dakota has a population of 774,948 and Chicago has a population of 2,720,546
which means that North Dakota has 1,945,598 fewer people than Chicago.
That makes North Dakota 4 times less populated than Chicago.
Yes, Chicago is more populated than North Dakota.
Chicago has a population of 2,720,546 and North Dakota has a population of 774,948
which means that Chicago has 1,945,598 more people than North Dakota.
That makes Chicago 4 times more populated than North Dakota.
No, Chicago is not less populated than North Dakota.
Chicago has a population of 2,720,546 and North Dakota has a population of 774,948
which means that Chicago has 1,945,598 more people than North Dakota.
That makes Chicago 4 times more populated than North Dakota.