On average across the year,
no, North Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Columbia, South Carolina
.
North Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 6°C/43°F and Columbia, South Carolina has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F.
North Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Columbia, South Carolina's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 34°C/93°F).
On average across the year, yes, North Dakota, United States is colder than Columbia, South Carolina . North Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F and Columbia, South Carolina has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
no, North Dakota, United States has less rain than
Columbia, South Carolina. North Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 465mm and Columbia, South Carolina has an average annual rainfall of 1330mm.
North Dakota, United States's wettest month is June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm, which is drier than Columbia, South Carolina's wettest month (July, with an average monthly rainfall of 147mm).
The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is approximately 1,395 miles (2,245km) north west of Columbia, South Carolina.
Yes, North Dakota, United States is further west than Columbia, South Carolina. The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 805 miles (1,296km).
No, North Dakota, United States is not further east than Columbia, South Carolina.
Yes, North Dakota, United States is further north than Columbia, South Carolina. The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 936 miles (1,507km).
No, North Dakota, United States is not further south than Columbia, South Carolina.
The midpoint of Columbia, South Carolina is approximately 1,395 miles (2,245km) south east of North Dakota, United States.
No, Columbia, South Carolina is not further west than North Dakota, United States.
Yes, Columbia, South Carolina is further east than North Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Columbia, South Carolina is further east by approximately 805 miles (1,296km).
No, Columbia, South Carolina is not further north than North Dakota, United States.
Yes, Columbia, South Carolina is further south than North Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Columbia, South Carolina is further south by approximately 936 miles (1,507km).
Yes, North Dakota is more populated than Columbia.
North Dakota has a population of 774,948 and Columbia has a population of 133,803
which means that North Dakota has 641,145 more people than Columbia.
That makes North Dakota 6 times more populated than Columbia.
No, North Dakota is not less populated than Columbia.
North Dakota has a population of 774,948 and Columbia has a population of 133,803
which means that North Dakota has 641,145 more people than Columbia.
That makes North Dakota 6 times more populated than Columbia.
No, Columbia is not more populated than North Dakota.
Columbia has a population of 133,803 and North Dakota has a population of 774,948
which means that Columbia has 641,145 fewer people than North Dakota.
That makes Columbia 6 times less populated than North Dakota.
Yes, Columbia is less populated than North Dakota.
Columbia has a population of 133,803 and North Dakota has a population of 774,948
which means that Columbia has 641,145 fewer people than North Dakota.
That makes Columbia 6 times less populated than North Dakota.