On average across the year,
no, North Dakota, United States is not hotter than
South San Francisco, California
.
North Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 6°C/43°F and South San Francisco, California has an average temperature of 15°C/59°F.
North Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is hotter than South San Francisco, California's hottest month (September, with an average maximum temperature of 24°C/75°F).
On average across the year, yes, North Dakota, United States is colder than South San Francisco, California . North Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F and South San Francisco, California has an average minimum temperature of 10°C/50°F.
On average across the year,
yes, North Dakota, United States has more rain than
South San Francisco, California. North Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 465mm and South San Francisco, California has an average annual rainfall of 455mm.
North Dakota, United States's wettest month is June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm, which is drier than South San Francisco, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 98mm).
The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is approximately 1,279 miles (2,058km) north east of South San Francisco, California.
No, North Dakota, United States is not further west than South San Francisco, California.
Yes, North Dakota, United States is further east than South San Francisco, California. The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 901 miles (1,450km).
Yes, North Dakota, United States is further north than South San Francisco, California. The midpoint of North Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 684 miles (1,100km).
No, North Dakota, United States is not further south than South San Francisco, California.
The midpoint of South San Francisco, California is approximately 1,279 miles (2,058km) south west of North Dakota, United States.
Yes, South San Francisco, California is further west than North Dakota, United States. The midpoint of South San Francisco, California is further west by approximately 901 miles (1,450km).
No, South San Francisco, California is not further east than North Dakota, United States.
No, South San Francisco, California is not further north than North Dakota, United States.
Yes, South San Francisco, California is further south than North Dakota, United States. The midpoint of South San Francisco, California is further south by approximately 684 miles (1,100km).
Yes, North Dakota is more populated than South San Francisco.
North Dakota has a population of 774,948 and South San Francisco has a population of 67,271
which means that North Dakota has 707,677 more people than South San Francisco.
That makes North Dakota 12 times more populated than South San Francisco.
No, North Dakota is not less populated than South San Francisco.
North Dakota has a population of 774,948 and South San Francisco has a population of 67,271
which means that North Dakota has 707,677 more people than South San Francisco.
That makes North Dakota 12 times more populated than South San Francisco.
No, South San Francisco is not more populated than North Dakota.
South San Francisco has a population of 67,271 and North Dakota has a population of 774,948
which means that South San Francisco has 707,677 fewer people than North Dakota.
That makes South San Francisco 12 times less populated than North Dakota.
Yes, South San Francisco is less populated than North Dakota.
South San Francisco has a population of 67,271 and North Dakota has a population of 774,948
which means that South San Francisco has 707,677 fewer people than North Dakota.
That makes South San Francisco 12 times less populated than North Dakota.