On average across the year,
no, Pasadena, California is not hotter than
Rancho Cucamonga, California
.
Pasadena, California has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
Pasadena, California's hottest month is August, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Rancho Cucamonga, California's hottest month (also August, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).
On average across the year, yes, Pasadena, California is colder than Rancho Cucamonga, California . Pasadena, California has an average minimum temperature of 14°C/57°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Pasadena, California has more rain than
Rancho Cucamonga, California. Pasadena, California has an average annual rainfall of 306mm and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average annual rainfall of 280mm.
Pasadena, California's wettest month is December, with an average monthly rainfall of 78mm, which is wetter than Rancho Cucamonga, California's wettest month (also December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm).
The midpoint of Pasadena, California is approximately 32 miles (51km) west of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, Pasadena, California is further west than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of Pasadena, California is further west by approximately 32 miles (51km).
No, Pasadena, California is not further east than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, Pasadena, California is further north than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of Pasadena, California is further north by approximately 3 miles (5km).
No, Pasadena, California is not further south than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is approximately 32 miles (51km) east of Pasadena, California.
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further west than Pasadena, California.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further east than Pasadena, California. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further east by approximately 32 miles (51km).
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further north than Pasadena, California.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further south than Pasadena, California. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further south by approximately 3 miles (5km).
No, Pasadena is not more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Pasadena has a population of 142,250 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that Pasadena has 32,986 fewer people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes Pasadena 1 times less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Yes, Pasadena is less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Pasadena has a population of 142,250 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that Pasadena has 32,986 fewer people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes Pasadena 1 times less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga is more populated than Pasadena.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and Pasadena has a population of 142,250
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 32,986 more people than Pasadena.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 1 times more populated than Pasadena.
No, Rancho Cucamonga is not less populated than Pasadena.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and Pasadena has a population of 142,250
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 32,986 more people than Pasadena.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 1 times more populated than Pasadena.