On average across the year,
no, Lancaster, California is not hotter than
Pasadena, California
.
Lancaster, California has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F and Pasadena, California has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F.
Lancaster, California's hottest month is August, with an average maximum temperature of 33°C/91°F, which is hotter than Pasadena, California's hottest month (also August, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, yes, Lancaster, California is colder than Pasadena, California . Lancaster, California has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F and Pasadena, California has an average minimum temperature of 14°C/57°F.
The midpoint of Lancaster, California is approximately 38 miles (61km) of Pasadena, California.
No, Lancaster, California is not further west than Pasadena, California.
No, Lancaster, California is not further east than Pasadena, California.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further north than Pasadena, California. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further north by approximately 38 miles (61km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further south than Pasadena, California.
The midpoint of Pasadena, California is approximately 38 miles (61km) south of Lancaster, California.
No, Pasadena, California is not further west than Lancaster, California.
No, Pasadena, California is not further east than Lancaster, California.
No, Pasadena, California is not further north than Lancaster, California.
Yes, Pasadena, California is further south than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of Pasadena, California is further south by approximately 38 miles (61km).
Yes, Lancaster is more populated than Pasadena.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and Pasadena has a population of 142,250
which means that Lancaster has 18,853 more people than Pasadena.
That makes Lancaster 1 times more populated than Pasadena.
No, Lancaster is not less populated than Pasadena.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and Pasadena has a population of 142,250
which means that Lancaster has 18,853 more people than Pasadena.
That makes Lancaster 1 times more populated than Pasadena.
No, Pasadena is not more populated than Lancaster.
Pasadena has a population of 142,250 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that Pasadena has 18,853 fewer people than Lancaster.
That makes Pasadena 1 times less populated than Lancaster.
Yes, Pasadena is less populated than Lancaster.
Pasadena has a population of 142,250 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that Pasadena has 18,853 fewer people than Lancaster.
That makes Pasadena 1 times less populated than Lancaster.