On average across the year,
no, Lancaster, California is not hotter than
Rancho Cucamonga, California
.
Lancaster, California has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
Lancaster, California's hottest month is August, with an average maximum temperature of 33°C/91°F, which is not hotter than Rancho Cucamonga, California's hottest month (also August, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).
On average across the year, yes, Lancaster, California is colder than Rancho Cucamonga, California . Lancaster, California has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
The midpoint of Lancaster, California is approximately 52 miles (83km) north west of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further west than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further west by approximately 31 miles (50km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further east than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further north than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further north by approximately 41 miles (66km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further south than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is approximately 52 miles (83km) south east of Lancaster, California.
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further west than Lancaster, California.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further east than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further east by approximately 31 miles (50km).
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further north than Lancaster, California.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further south than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further south by approximately 41 miles (66km).
No, Lancaster is not more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that Lancaster has 14,133 fewer people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes Lancaster 1 times less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Yes, Lancaster is less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that Lancaster has 14,133 fewer people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes Lancaster 1 times less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga is more populated than Lancaster.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 14,133 more people than Lancaster.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 1 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, Rancho Cucamonga is not less populated than Lancaster.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 14,133 more people than Lancaster.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 1 times more populated than Lancaster.