On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Lancaster, California
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Lancaster, California has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than Lancaster, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 33°C/91°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Lancaster, California . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Lancaster, California has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F.
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 1,162 miles (1,870km) north east of Lancaster, California.
No, South Dakota, United States is not further west than Lancaster, California.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further east than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 834 miles (1,342km).
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Lancaster, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 641 miles (1,031km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Lancaster, California.
The midpoint of Lancaster, California is approximately 1,162 miles (1,870km) south west of South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further west than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further west by approximately 834 miles (1,342km).
No, Lancaster, California is not further east than South Dakota, United States.
No, Lancaster, California is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Lancaster, California is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Lancaster, California is further south by approximately 641 miles (1,031km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Lancaster.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that South Dakota has 734,273 more people than Lancaster.
That makes South Dakota 6 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Lancaster.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Lancaster has a population of 161,103
which means that South Dakota has 734,273 more people than Lancaster.
That makes South Dakota 6 times more populated than Lancaster.
No, Lancaster is not more populated than South Dakota.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Lancaster has 734,273 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Lancaster 6 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Lancaster is less populated than South Dakota.
Lancaster has a population of 161,103 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Lancaster has 734,273 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Lancaster 6 times less populated than South Dakota.