On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Aurora, Illinois
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Aurora, Illinois has an average temperature of 10°C/50°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than Aurora, Illinois's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Aurora, Illinois . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Aurora, Illinois has an average minimum temperature of 5°C/41°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States has less rain than
Aurora, Illinois. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Aurora, Illinois has an average annual rainfall of 1160mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Aurora, Illinois's wettest month (also May, with an average monthly rainfall of 171mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 605 miles (974km) west of Aurora, Illinois.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Aurora, Illinois. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 566 miles (911km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Aurora, Illinois.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Aurora, Illinois. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 153 miles (246km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Aurora, Illinois.
The midpoint of Aurora, Illinois is approximately 605 miles (974km) east of South Dakota, United States.
No, Aurora, Illinois is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Aurora, Illinois is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Aurora, Illinois is further east by approximately 566 miles (911km).
No, Aurora, Illinois is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Aurora, Illinois is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Aurora, Illinois is further south by approximately 153 miles (246km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Aurora.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Aurora has a population of 200,661
which means that South Dakota has 694,715 more people than Aurora.
That makes South Dakota 5 times more populated than Aurora.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Aurora.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Aurora has a population of 200,661
which means that South Dakota has 694,715 more people than Aurora.
That makes South Dakota 5 times more populated than Aurora.
No, Aurora is not more populated than South Dakota.
Aurora has a population of 200,661 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Aurora has 694,715 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Aurora 5 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Aurora is less populated than South Dakota.
Aurora has a population of 200,661 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Aurora has 694,715 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Aurora 5 times less populated than South Dakota.