On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Aurora, Colorado
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Aurora, Colorado has an average temperature of 11°C/52°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than Aurora, Colorado's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 32°C/90°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Aurora, Colorado . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Aurora, Colorado has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F.
On average across the year,
yes, South Dakota, United States has more rain than
Aurora, Colorado. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Aurora, Colorado has an average annual rainfall of 420mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Aurora, Colorado's wettest month (also May, with an average monthly rainfall of 80mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 387 miles (623km) north east of Aurora, Colorado.
No, South Dakota, United States is not further west than Aurora, Colorado.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further east than Aurora, Colorado. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 237 miles (381km).
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Aurora, Colorado. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 293 miles (471km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Aurora, Colorado.
The midpoint of Aurora, Colorado is approximately 387 miles (623km) south west of South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Aurora, Colorado is further west than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Aurora, Colorado is further west by approximately 237 miles (381km).
No, Aurora, Colorado is not further east than South Dakota, United States.
No, Aurora, Colorado is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Aurora, Colorado is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Aurora, Colorado is further south by approximately 293 miles (471km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Aurora.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Aurora has a population of 359,407
which means that South Dakota has 535,969 more people than Aurora.
That makes South Dakota 3 times more populated than Aurora.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Aurora.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Aurora has a population of 359,407
which means that South Dakota has 535,969 more people than Aurora.
That makes South Dakota 3 times more populated than Aurora.
No, Aurora is not more populated than South Dakota.
Aurora has a population of 359,407 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Aurora has 535,969 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Aurora 3 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Aurora is less populated than South Dakota.
Aurora has a population of 359,407 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Aurora has 535,969 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Aurora 3 times less populated than South Dakota.