On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Bakersfield, California
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Bakersfield, California has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than Bakersfield, California's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 38°C/100°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Bakersfield, California . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Bakersfield, California has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
yes, South Dakota, United States has more rain than
Bakersfield, California. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Bakersfield, California has an average annual rainfall of 150mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is wetter than Bakersfield, California's wettest month (March, with an average monthly rainfall of 30mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 1,173 miles (1,888km) north east of Bakersfield, California.
No, South Dakota, United States is not further west than Bakersfield, California.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further east than Bakersfield, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 880 miles (1,416km).
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Bakersfield, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 594 miles (956km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Bakersfield, California.
The midpoint of Bakersfield, California is approximately 1,173 miles (1,888km) south west of South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Bakersfield, California is further west than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Bakersfield, California is further west by approximately 880 miles (1,416km).
No, Bakersfield, California is not further east than South Dakota, United States.
No, Bakersfield, California is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Bakersfield, California is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Bakersfield, California is further south by approximately 594 miles (956km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Bakersfield.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Bakersfield has a population of 373,640
which means that South Dakota has 521,736 more people than Bakersfield.
That makes South Dakota 2 times more populated than Bakersfield.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Bakersfield.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Bakersfield has a population of 373,640
which means that South Dakota has 521,736 more people than Bakersfield.
That makes South Dakota 2 times more populated than Bakersfield.
No, Bakersfield is not more populated than South Dakota.
Bakersfield has a population of 373,640 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Bakersfield has 521,736 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Bakersfield 2 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Bakersfield is less populated than South Dakota.
Bakersfield has a population of 373,640 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Bakersfield has 521,736 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Bakersfield 2 times less populated than South Dakota.