On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Chicago, Illinois
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Chicago, Illinois has an average temperature of 11°C/52°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is approximately the same temperature as Chicago, Illinois's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Chicago, Illinois . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Chicago, Illinois has an average minimum temperature of 7°C/45°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States has less rain than
Chicago, Illinois. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Chicago, Illinois has an average annual rainfall of 1222mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Chicago, Illinois's wettest month (also May, with an average monthly rainfall of 162mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 636 miles (1,024km) west of Chicago, Illinois.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Chicago, Illinois. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 599 miles (964km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Chicago, Illinois.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Chicago, Illinois. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 147 miles (236km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Chicago, Illinois.
The midpoint of Chicago, Illinois is approximately 636 miles (1,024km) east of South Dakota, United States.
No, Chicago, Illinois is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Chicago, Illinois is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Chicago, Illinois is further east by approximately 599 miles (964km).
No, Chicago, Illinois is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Chicago, Illinois is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Chicago, Illinois is further south by approximately 147 miles (236km).
No, South Dakota is not more populated than Chicago.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Chicago has a population of 2,720,546
which means that South Dakota has 1,825,170 fewer people than Chicago.
That makes South Dakota 3 times less populated than Chicago.
Yes, South Dakota is less populated than Chicago.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Chicago has a population of 2,720,546
which means that South Dakota has 1,825,170 fewer people than Chicago.
That makes South Dakota 3 times less populated than Chicago.
Yes, Chicago is more populated than South Dakota.
Chicago has a population of 2,720,546 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Chicago has 1,825,170 more people than South Dakota.
That makes Chicago 3 times more populated than South Dakota.
No, Chicago is not less populated than South Dakota.
Chicago has a population of 2,720,546 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Chicago has 1,825,170 more people than South Dakota.
That makes Chicago 3 times more populated than South Dakota.