On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Concord, New Hampshire
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Concord, New Hampshire has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than Concord, New Hampshire's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Concord, New Hampshire . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Concord, New Hampshire has an average minimum temperature of 2°C/36°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States has less rain than
Concord, New Hampshire. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Concord, New Hampshire has an average annual rainfall of 1187mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Concord, New Hampshire's wettest month (August, with an average monthly rainfall of 129mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 1,414 miles (2,275km) west of Concord, New Hampshire.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Concord, New Hampshire. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 1,403 miles (2,258km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Concord, New Hampshire.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Concord, New Hampshire. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 53 miles (85km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Concord, New Hampshire.
The midpoint of Concord, New Hampshire is approximately 1,414 miles (2,275km) east of South Dakota, United States.
No, Concord, New Hampshire is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Concord, New Hampshire is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Concord, New Hampshire is further east by approximately 1,403 miles (2,258km).
No, Concord, New Hampshire is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Concord, New Hampshire is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Concord, New Hampshire is further south by approximately 53 miles (85km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Concord.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Concord has a population of 42,620
which means that South Dakota has 852,756 more people than Concord.
That makes South Dakota 21 times more populated than Concord.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Concord.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Concord has a population of 42,620
which means that South Dakota has 852,756 more people than Concord.
That makes South Dakota 21 times more populated than Concord.
No, Concord is not more populated than South Dakota.
Concord has a population of 42,620 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Concord has 852,756 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Concord 21 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Concord is less populated than South Dakota.
Concord has a population of 42,620 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Concord has 852,756 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Concord 21 times less populated than South Dakota.