On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Dublin, California
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Dublin, California has an average temperature of 15°C/59°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than Dublin, California's hottest month (September, with an average maximum temperature of 24°C/75°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Dublin, California . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Dublin, California has an average minimum temperature of 10°C/50°F.
On average across the year,
yes, South Dakota, United States has more rain than
Dublin, California. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Dublin, California has an average annual rainfall of 455mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Dublin, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 98mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 1,226 miles (1,973km) east of Dublin, California.
No, South Dakota, United States is not further west than Dublin, California.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further east than Dublin, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 1,037 miles (1,669km).
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Dublin, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 433 miles (697km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Dublin, California.
The midpoint of Dublin, California is approximately 1,226 miles (1,973km) west of South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Dublin, California is further west than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Dublin, California is further west by approximately 1,037 miles (1,669km).
No, Dublin, California is not further east than South Dakota, United States.
No, Dublin, California is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Dublin, California is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Dublin, California is further south by approximately 433 miles (697km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Dublin.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Dublin has a population of 57,721
which means that South Dakota has 837,655 more people than Dublin.
That makes South Dakota 16 times more populated than Dublin.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Dublin.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Dublin has a population of 57,721
which means that South Dakota has 837,655 more people than Dublin.
That makes South Dakota 16 times more populated than Dublin.
No, Dublin is not more populated than South Dakota.
Dublin has a population of 57,721 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Dublin has 837,655 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Dublin 16 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Dublin is less populated than South Dakota.
Dublin has a population of 57,721 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Dublin has 837,655 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Dublin 16 times less populated than South Dakota.