On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Las Vegas, Nevada
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Las Vegas, Nevada has an average temperature of 22°C/72°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than Las Vegas, Nevada's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 40°C/104°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Las Vegas, Nevada . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Las Vegas, Nevada has an average minimum temperature of 16°C/61°F.
On average across the year,
yes, South Dakota, United States has more rain than
Las Vegas, Nevada. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Las Vegas, Nevada has an average annual rainfall of 97mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is wetter than Las Vegas, Nevada's wettest month (January, with an average monthly rainfall of 14mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 966 miles (1,555km) north east of Las Vegas, Nevada.
No, South Dakota, United States is not further west than Las Vegas, Nevada.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further east than Las Vegas, Nevada. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 707 miles (1,138km).
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Las Vegas, Nevada. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 539 miles (867km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Las Vegas, Nevada.
The midpoint of Las Vegas, Nevada is approximately 966 miles (1,555km) south west of South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Las Vegas, Nevada is further west than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Las Vegas, Nevada is further west by approximately 707 miles (1,138km).
No, Las Vegas, Nevada is not further east than South Dakota, United States.
No, Las Vegas, Nevada is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Las Vegas, Nevada is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Las Vegas, Nevada is further south by approximately 539 miles (867km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Las Vegas.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Las Vegas has a population of 623,747
which means that South Dakota has 271,629 more people than Las Vegas.
That makes South Dakota 1 times more populated than Las Vegas.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Las Vegas.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Las Vegas has a population of 623,747
which means that South Dakota has 271,629 more people than Las Vegas.
That makes South Dakota 1 times more populated than Las Vegas.
No, Las Vegas is not more populated than South Dakota.
Las Vegas has a population of 623,747 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Las Vegas has 271,629 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Las Vegas 1 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Las Vegas is less populated than South Dakota.
Las Vegas has a population of 623,747 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Las Vegas has 271,629 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Las Vegas 1 times less populated than South Dakota.