On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Lincoln, Nebraska
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Lincoln, Nebraska has an average temperature of 11°C/52°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than Lincoln, Nebraska's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 32°C/90°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Lincoln, Nebraska . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Lincoln, Nebraska has an average minimum temperature of 5°C/41°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States has less rain than
Lincoln, Nebraska. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Lincoln, Nebraska has an average annual rainfall of 862mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Lincoln, Nebraska's wettest month (also May, with an average monthly rainfall of 159mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 274 miles (441km) north west of Lincoln, Nebraska.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Lincoln, Nebraska. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 157 miles (253km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Lincoln, Nebraska.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Lincoln, Nebraska. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 219 miles (352km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Lincoln, Nebraska.
The midpoint of Lincoln, Nebraska is approximately 274 miles (441km) south east of South Dakota, United States.
No, Lincoln, Nebraska is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Lincoln, Nebraska is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Lincoln, Nebraska is further east by approximately 157 miles (253km).
No, Lincoln, Nebraska is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Lincoln, Nebraska is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Lincoln, Nebraska is further south by approximately 219 miles (352km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Lincoln.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Lincoln has a population of 277,348
which means that South Dakota has 618,028 more people than Lincoln.
That makes South Dakota 3 times more populated than Lincoln.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Lincoln.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Lincoln has a population of 277,348
which means that South Dakota has 618,028 more people than Lincoln.
That makes South Dakota 3 times more populated than Lincoln.
No, Lincoln is not more populated than South Dakota.
Lincoln has a population of 277,348 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Lincoln has 618,028 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Lincoln 3 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Lincoln is less populated than South Dakota.
Lincoln has a population of 277,348 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Lincoln has 618,028 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Lincoln 3 times less populated than South Dakota.