On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Manchester, New Hampshire
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Manchester, New Hampshire has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than Manchester, New Hampshire's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Manchester, New Hampshire . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Manchester, New Hampshire has an average minimum temperature of 2°C/36°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States has less rain than
Manchester, New Hampshire. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Manchester, New Hampshire has an average annual rainfall of 1187mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Manchester, New Hampshire's wettest month (August, with an average monthly rainfall of 129mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 1,420 miles (2,286km) west of Manchester, New Hampshire.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Manchester, New Hampshire. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 1,405 miles (2,261km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Manchester, New Hampshire.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Manchester, New Hampshire. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 67 miles (108km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Manchester, New Hampshire.
The midpoint of Manchester, New Hampshire is approximately 1,420 miles (2,286km) east of South Dakota, United States.
No, Manchester, New Hampshire is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Manchester, New Hampshire is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Manchester, New Hampshire is further east by approximately 1,405 miles (2,261km).
No, Manchester, New Hampshire is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Manchester, New Hampshire is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Manchester, New Hampshire is further south by approximately 67 miles (108km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Manchester.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Manchester has a population of 110,229
which means that South Dakota has 785,147 more people than Manchester.
That makes South Dakota 8 times more populated than Manchester.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Manchester.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Manchester has a population of 110,229
which means that South Dakota has 785,147 more people than Manchester.
That makes South Dakota 8 times more populated than Manchester.
No, Manchester is not more populated than South Dakota.
Manchester has a population of 110,229 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Manchester has 785,147 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Manchester 8 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Manchester is less populated than South Dakota.
Manchester has a population of 110,229 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Manchester has 785,147 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Manchester 8 times less populated than South Dakota.