On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Naperville, Illinois
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Naperville, Illinois has an average temperature of 10°C/50°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than Naperville, Illinois's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Naperville, Illinois . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Naperville, Illinois has an average minimum temperature of 5°C/41°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States has less rain than
Naperville, Illinois. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Naperville, Illinois has an average annual rainfall of 928mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Naperville, Illinois's wettest month (also May, with an average monthly rainfall of 140mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 613 miles (987km) west of Naperville, Illinois.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Naperville, Illinois. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 574 miles (924km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Naperville, Illinois.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Naperville, Illinois. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 151 miles (243km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Naperville, Illinois.
The midpoint of Naperville, Illinois is approximately 613 miles (987km) east of South Dakota, United States.
No, Naperville, Illinois is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Naperville, Illinois is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Naperville, Illinois is further east by approximately 574 miles (924km).
No, Naperville, Illinois is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Naperville, Illinois is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Naperville, Illinois is further south by approximately 151 miles (243km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Naperville.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Naperville has a population of 147,100
which means that South Dakota has 748,276 more people than Naperville.
That makes South Dakota 6 times more populated than Naperville.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Naperville.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Naperville has a population of 147,100
which means that South Dakota has 748,276 more people than Naperville.
That makes South Dakota 6 times more populated than Naperville.
No, Naperville is not more populated than South Dakota.
Naperville has a population of 147,100 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Naperville has 748,276 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Naperville 6 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Naperville is less populated than South Dakota.
Naperville has a population of 147,100 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Naperville has 748,276 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Naperville 6 times less populated than South Dakota.