On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
North Hills, California
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and North Hills, California has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than North Hills, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than North Hills, California . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and North Hills, California has an average minimum temperature of 14°C/57°F.
On average across the year,
yes, South Dakota, United States has more rain than
North Hills, California. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and North Hills, California has an average annual rainfall of 306mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than North Hills, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 78mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 1,197 miles (1,927km) north east of North Hills, California.
No, South Dakota, United States is not further west than North Hills, California.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further east than North Hills, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 846 miles (1,362km).
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than North Hills, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 672 miles (1,082km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than North Hills, California.
The midpoint of North Hills, California is approximately 1,197 miles (1,927km) south west of South Dakota, United States.
Yes, North Hills, California is further west than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of North Hills, California is further west by approximately 846 miles (1,362km).
No, North Hills, California is not further east than South Dakota, United States.
No, North Hills, California is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, North Hills, California is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of North Hills, California is further south by approximately 672 miles (1,082km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than North Hills.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and North Hills has a population of 56,946
which means that South Dakota has 838,430 more people than North Hills.
That makes South Dakota 16 times more populated than North Hills.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than North Hills.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and North Hills has a population of 56,946
which means that South Dakota has 838,430 more people than North Hills.
That makes South Dakota 16 times more populated than North Hills.
No, North Hills is not more populated than South Dakota.
North Hills has a population of 56,946 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that North Hills has 838,430 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes North Hills 16 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, North Hills is less populated than South Dakota.
North Hills has a population of 56,946 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that North Hills has 838,430 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes North Hills 16 times less populated than South Dakota.