On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
North La Crosse, Wisconsin
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and North La Crosse, Wisconsin has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is approximately the same temperature as North La Crosse, Wisconsin's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than North La Crosse, Wisconsin . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and North La Crosse, Wisconsin has an average minimum temperature of 4°C/39°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States has less rain than
North La Crosse, Wisconsin. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and North La Crosse, Wisconsin has an average annual rainfall of 1036mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than North La Crosse, Wisconsin's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 159mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 431 miles (693km) west of North La Crosse, Wisconsin.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than North La Crosse, Wisconsin. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 430 miles (692km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than North La Crosse, Wisconsin.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than North La Crosse, Wisconsin. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 9 miles (14km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than North La Crosse, Wisconsin.
The midpoint of North La Crosse, Wisconsin is approximately 431 miles (693km) east of South Dakota, United States.
No, North La Crosse, Wisconsin is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, North La Crosse, Wisconsin is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of North La Crosse, Wisconsin is further east by approximately 430 miles (692km).
No, North La Crosse, Wisconsin is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, North La Crosse, Wisconsin is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of North La Crosse, Wisconsin is further south by approximately 9 miles (14km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than North La Crosse.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and North La Crosse has a population of 50,470
which means that South Dakota has 844,906 more people than North La Crosse.
That makes South Dakota 18 times more populated than North La Crosse.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than North La Crosse.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and North La Crosse has a population of 50,470
which means that South Dakota has 844,906 more people than North La Crosse.
That makes South Dakota 18 times more populated than North La Crosse.
No, North La Crosse is not more populated than South Dakota.
North La Crosse has a population of 50,470 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that North La Crosse has 844,906 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes North La Crosse 18 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, North La Crosse is less populated than South Dakota.
North La Crosse has a population of 50,470 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that North La Crosse has 844,906 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes North La Crosse 18 times less populated than South Dakota.