On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
North Las Vegas, Nevada
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and North Las Vegas, Nevada has an average temperature of 22°C/72°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than North Las Vegas, Nevada's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 40°C/104°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than North Las Vegas, Nevada . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and North Las Vegas, Nevada has an average minimum temperature of 16°C/61°F.
On average across the year,
yes, South Dakota, United States has more rain than
North Las Vegas, Nevada. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and North Las Vegas, Nevada has an average annual rainfall of 97mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is wetter than North Las Vegas, Nevada's wettest month (January, with an average monthly rainfall of 14mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 964 miles (1,552km) north east of North Las Vegas, Nevada.
No, South Dakota, United States is not further west than North Las Vegas, Nevada.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further east than North Las Vegas, Nevada. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 706 miles (1,136km).
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than North Las Vegas, Nevada. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 537 miles (864km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than North Las Vegas, Nevada.
The midpoint of North Las Vegas, Nevada is approximately 964 miles (1,552km) south west of South Dakota, United States.
Yes, North Las Vegas, Nevada is further west than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of North Las Vegas, Nevada is further west by approximately 706 miles (1,136km).
No, North Las Vegas, Nevada is not further east than South Dakota, United States.
No, North Las Vegas, Nevada is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, North Las Vegas, Nevada is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of North Las Vegas, Nevada is further south by approximately 537 miles (864km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than North Las Vegas.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and North Las Vegas has a population of 234,807
which means that South Dakota has 660,569 more people than North Las Vegas.
That makes South Dakota 4 times more populated than North Las Vegas.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than North Las Vegas.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and North Las Vegas has a population of 234,807
which means that South Dakota has 660,569 more people than North Las Vegas.
That makes South Dakota 4 times more populated than North Las Vegas.
No, North Las Vegas is not more populated than South Dakota.
North Las Vegas has a population of 234,807 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that North Las Vegas has 660,569 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes North Las Vegas 4 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, North Las Vegas is less populated than South Dakota.
North Las Vegas has a population of 234,807 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that North Las Vegas has 660,569 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes North Las Vegas 4 times less populated than South Dakota.