On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
San Francisco, California
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and San Francisco, California has an average temperature of 15°C/59°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than San Francisco, California's hottest month (September, with an average maximum temperature of 24°C/75°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than San Francisco, California . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and San Francisco, California has an average minimum temperature of 10°C/50°F.
On average across the year,
yes, South Dakota, United States has more rain than
San Francisco, California. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and San Francisco, California has an average annual rainfall of 455mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than San Francisco, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 98mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 1,247 miles (2,007km) east of San Francisco, California.
No, South Dakota, United States is not further west than San Francisco, California.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further east than San Francisco, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 1,061 miles (1,708km).
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than San Francisco, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 428 miles (689km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than San Francisco, California.
The midpoint of San Francisco, California is approximately 1,247 miles (2,007km) west of South Dakota, United States.
Yes, San Francisco, California is further west than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of San Francisco, California is further west by approximately 1,061 miles (1,708km).
No, San Francisco, California is not further east than South Dakota, United States.
No, San Francisco, California is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, San Francisco, California is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of San Francisco, California is further south by approximately 428 miles (689km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than San Francisco.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and San Francisco has a population of 864,816
which means that South Dakota has 30,560 more people than San Francisco.
That makes South Dakota 1 times more populated than San Francisco.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than San Francisco.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and San Francisco has a population of 864,816
which means that South Dakota has 30,560 more people than San Francisco.
That makes South Dakota 1 times more populated than San Francisco.
No, San Francisco is not more populated than South Dakota.
San Francisco has a population of 864,816 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that San Francisco has 30,560 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes San Francisco 1 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, San Francisco is less populated than South Dakota.
San Francisco has a population of 864,816 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that San Francisco has 30,560 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes San Francisco 1 times less populated than South Dakota.