On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Schaumburg, Illinois
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Schaumburg, Illinois has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than Schaumburg, Illinois's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 28°C/82°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Schaumburg, Illinois . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Schaumburg, Illinois has an average minimum temperature of 4°C/39°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States has less rain than
Schaumburg, Illinois. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Schaumburg, Illinois has an average annual rainfall of 1173mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Schaumburg, Illinois's wettest month (also May, with an average monthly rainfall of 169mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 611 miles (984km) west of Schaumburg, Illinois.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Schaumburg, Illinois. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 579 miles (932km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Schaumburg, Illinois.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Schaumburg, Illinois. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 134 miles (215km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Schaumburg, Illinois.
The midpoint of Schaumburg, Illinois is approximately 611 miles (984km) east of South Dakota, United States.
No, Schaumburg, Illinois is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Schaumburg, Illinois is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Schaumburg, Illinois is further east by approximately 579 miles (932km).
No, Schaumburg, Illinois is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Schaumburg, Illinois is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Schaumburg, Illinois is further south by approximately 134 miles (215km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Schaumburg.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Schaumburg has a population of 74,693
which means that South Dakota has 820,683 more people than Schaumburg.
That makes South Dakota 12 times more populated than Schaumburg.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Schaumburg.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Schaumburg has a population of 74,693
which means that South Dakota has 820,683 more people than Schaumburg.
That makes South Dakota 12 times more populated than Schaumburg.
No, Schaumburg is not more populated than South Dakota.
Schaumburg has a population of 74,693 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Schaumburg has 820,683 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Schaumburg 12 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Schaumburg is less populated than South Dakota.
Schaumburg has a population of 74,693 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Schaumburg has 820,683 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Schaumburg 12 times less populated than South Dakota.