On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
South San Francisco, California
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and South San Francisco, California has an average temperature of 15°C/59°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than South San Francisco, California's hottest month (September, with an average maximum temperature of 24°C/75°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than South San Francisco, California . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and South San Francisco, California has an average minimum temperature of 10°C/50°F.
On average across the year,
yes, South Dakota, United States has more rain than
South San Francisco, California. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and South San Francisco, California has an average annual rainfall of 455mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than South San Francisco, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 98mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 1,250 miles (2,012km) east of South San Francisco, California.
No, South Dakota, United States is not further west than South San Francisco, California.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further east than South San Francisco, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 1,059 miles (1,704km).
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than South San Francisco, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 436 miles (702km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than South San Francisco, California.
The midpoint of South San Francisco, California is approximately 1,250 miles (2,012km) west of South Dakota, United States.
Yes, South San Francisco, California is further west than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of South San Francisco, California is further west by approximately 1,059 miles (1,704km).
No, South San Francisco, California is not further east than South Dakota, United States.
No, South San Francisco, California is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, South San Francisco, California is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of South San Francisco, California is further south by approximately 436 miles (702km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than South San Francisco.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and South San Francisco has a population of 67,271
which means that South Dakota has 828,105 more people than South San Francisco.
That makes South Dakota 13 times more populated than South San Francisco.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than South San Francisco.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and South San Francisco has a population of 67,271
which means that South Dakota has 828,105 more people than South San Francisco.
That makes South Dakota 13 times more populated than South San Francisco.
No, South San Francisco is not more populated than South Dakota.
South San Francisco has a population of 67,271 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that South San Francisco has 828,105 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes South San Francisco 13 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, South San Francisco is less populated than South Dakota.
South San Francisco has a population of 67,271 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that South San Francisco has 828,105 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes South San Francisco 13 times less populated than South Dakota.