On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Tulsa, Oklahoma
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Tulsa, Oklahoma has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than Tulsa, Oklahoma's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Tulsa, Oklahoma . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Tulsa, Oklahoma has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States has less rain than
Tulsa, Oklahoma. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Tulsa, Oklahoma has an average annual rainfall of 1111mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Tulsa, Oklahoma's wettest month (also May, with an average monthly rainfall of 165mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 578 miles (930km) of Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further west than Tulsa, Oklahoma. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further west by approximately 181 miles (291km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further east than Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Tulsa, Oklahoma. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 540 miles (869km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Tulsa, Oklahoma.
The midpoint of Tulsa, Oklahoma is approximately 578 miles (930km) south of South Dakota, United States.
No, Tulsa, Oklahoma is not further west than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Tulsa, Oklahoma is further east than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Tulsa, Oklahoma is further east by approximately 181 miles (291km).
No, Tulsa, Oklahoma is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Tulsa, Oklahoma is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Tulsa, Oklahoma is further south by approximately 540 miles (869km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Tulsa.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Tulsa has a population of 403,505
which means that South Dakota has 491,871 more people than Tulsa.
That makes South Dakota 2 times more populated than Tulsa.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Tulsa.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Tulsa has a population of 403,505
which means that South Dakota has 491,871 more people than Tulsa.
That makes South Dakota 2 times more populated than Tulsa.
No, Tulsa is not more populated than South Dakota.
Tulsa has a population of 403,505 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Tulsa has 491,871 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Tulsa 2 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Tulsa is less populated than South Dakota.
Tulsa has a population of 403,505 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Tulsa has 491,871 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Tulsa 2 times less populated than South Dakota.