On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Vancouver, Washington
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Vancouver, Washington has an average temperature of 12°C/54°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is hotter than Vancouver, Washington's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Vancouver, Washington . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Vancouver, Washington has an average minimum temperature of 8°C/46°F.
On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States has less rain than
Vancouver, Washington. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Vancouver, Washington has an average annual rainfall of 1188mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is drier than Vancouver, Washington's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 177mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 1,118 miles (1,799km) east of Vancouver, Washington.
No, South Dakota, United States is not further west than Vancouver, Washington.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further east than Vancouver, Washington. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 1,149 miles (1,849km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further north than Vancouver, Washington.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further south than Vancouver, Washington. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further south by approximately 116 miles (186km).
The midpoint of Vancouver, Washington is approximately 1,118 miles (1,799km) west of South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Vancouver, Washington is further west than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Vancouver, Washington is further west by approximately 1,149 miles (1,849km).
No, Vancouver, Washington is not further east than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Vancouver, Washington is further north than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Vancouver, Washington is further north by approximately 116 miles (186km).
No, Vancouver, Washington is not further south than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Vancouver.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Vancouver has a population of 172,860
which means that South Dakota has 722,516 more people than Vancouver.
That makes South Dakota 5 times more populated than Vancouver.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Vancouver.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Vancouver has a population of 172,860
which means that South Dakota has 722,516 more people than Vancouver.
That makes South Dakota 5 times more populated than Vancouver.
No, Vancouver is not more populated than South Dakota.
Vancouver has a population of 172,860 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Vancouver has 722,516 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Vancouver 5 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Vancouver is less populated than South Dakota.
Vancouver has a population of 172,860 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Vancouver has 722,516 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Vancouver 5 times less populated than South Dakota.