On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States is hotter than
Bismarck, North Dakota
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Bismarck, North Dakota's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, New Hampshire, United States is not colder than Bismarck, North Dakota . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Bismarck, North Dakota. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 515mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is wetter than Bismarck, North Dakota's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 1,440 miles (2,318km) east of Bismarck, North Dakota.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 1,516 miles (2,440km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further north than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further south than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further south by approximately 250 miles (402km).
The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is approximately 1,440 miles (2,318km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further west by approximately 1,516 miles (2,440km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further north than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further north by approximately 250 miles (402km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further south than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Bismarck.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that New Hampshire has 1,317,825 more people than Bismarck.
That makes New Hampshire 20 times more populated than Bismarck.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Bismarck.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that New Hampshire has 1,317,825 more people than Bismarck.
That makes New Hampshire 20 times more populated than Bismarck.
No, Bismarck is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Bismarck has 1,317,825 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Bismarck 20 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Bismarck is less populated than New Hampshire.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Bismarck has 1,317,825 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Bismarck 20 times less populated than New Hampshire.