On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Chicago, Illinois
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Chicago, Illinois has an average temperature of 11°C/52°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Chicago, Illinois's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Chicago, Illinois . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Chicago, Illinois has an average minimum temperature of 7°C/45°F.
On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States has less rain than
Chicago, Illinois. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Chicago, Illinois has an average annual rainfall of 1222mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is drier than Chicago, Illinois's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 162mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 823 miles (1,324km) east of Chicago, Illinois.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Chicago, Illinois.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Chicago, Illinois. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 802 miles (1,291km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Chicago, Illinois. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 93 miles (149km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Chicago, Illinois.
The midpoint of Chicago, Illinois is approximately 823 miles (1,324km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Chicago, Illinois is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Chicago, Illinois is further west by approximately 802 miles (1,291km).
No, Chicago, Illinois is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Chicago, Illinois is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Chicago, Illinois is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Chicago, Illinois is further south by approximately 93 miles (149km).
No, New Hampshire is not more populated than Chicago.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Chicago has a population of 2,720,546
which means that New Hampshire has 1,331,554 fewer people than Chicago.
That makes New Hampshire 2 times less populated than Chicago.
Yes, New Hampshire is less populated than Chicago.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Chicago has a population of 2,720,546
which means that New Hampshire has 1,331,554 fewer people than Chicago.
That makes New Hampshire 2 times less populated than Chicago.
Yes, Chicago is more populated than New Hampshire.
Chicago has a population of 2,720,546 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Chicago has 1,331,554 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Chicago 2 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, Chicago is not less populated than New Hampshire.
Chicago has a population of 2,720,546 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Chicago has 1,331,554 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes Chicago 2 times more populated than New Hampshire.