On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Columbia, South Carolina
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Columbia, South Carolina has an average temperature of 19°C/66°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Columbia, South Carolina's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 34°C/93°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Columbia, South Carolina . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Columbia, South Carolina has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States has less rain than
Columbia, South Carolina. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Columbia, South Carolina has an average annual rainfall of 1330mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is drier than Columbia, South Carolina's wettest month (July, with an average monthly rainfall of 147mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 814 miles (1,310km) north east of Columbia, South Carolina.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Columbia, South Carolina.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Columbia, South Carolina. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 440 miles (708km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Columbia, South Carolina. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 635 miles (1,022km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Columbia, South Carolina.
The midpoint of Columbia, South Carolina is approximately 814 miles (1,310km) south west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Columbia, South Carolina is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Columbia, South Carolina is further west by approximately 440 miles (708km).
No, Columbia, South Carolina is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Columbia, South Carolina is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Columbia, South Carolina is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Columbia, South Carolina is further south by approximately 635 miles (1,022km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Columbia.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Columbia has a population of 133,803
which means that New Hampshire has 1,255,189 more people than Columbia.
That makes New Hampshire 10 times more populated than Columbia.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Columbia.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Columbia has a population of 133,803
which means that New Hampshire has 1,255,189 more people than Columbia.
That makes New Hampshire 10 times more populated than Columbia.
No, Columbia is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Columbia has a population of 133,803 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Columbia has 1,255,189 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Columbia 10 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Columbia is less populated than New Hampshire.
Columbia has a population of 133,803 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Columbia has 1,255,189 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Columbia 10 times less populated than New Hampshire.