On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States is hotter than
Duluth, Minnesota
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Duluth, Minnesota has an average temperature of 5°C/41°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is hotter than Duluth, Minnesota's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 26°C/79°F).
On average across the year, no, New Hampshire, United States is not colder than Duluth, Minnesota . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Duluth, Minnesota has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Duluth, Minnesota. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Duluth, Minnesota has an average annual rainfall of 845mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is wetter than Duluth, Minnesota's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 120mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 1,030 miles (1,658km) east of Duluth, Minnesota.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Duluth, Minnesota.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Duluth, Minnesota. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 1,065 miles (1,714km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further north than Duluth, Minnesota.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further south than Duluth, Minnesota. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further south by approximately 248 miles (399km).
The midpoint of Duluth, Minnesota is approximately 1,030 miles (1,658km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Duluth, Minnesota is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Duluth, Minnesota is further west by approximately 1,065 miles (1,714km).
No, Duluth, Minnesota is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Duluth, Minnesota is further north than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Duluth, Minnesota is further north by approximately 248 miles (399km).
No, Duluth, Minnesota is not further south than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Duluth.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Duluth has a population of 86,110
which means that New Hampshire has 1,302,882 more people than Duluth.
That makes New Hampshire 16 times more populated than Duluth.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Duluth.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Duluth has a population of 86,110
which means that New Hampshire has 1,302,882 more people than Duluth.
That makes New Hampshire 16 times more populated than Duluth.
No, Duluth is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Duluth has a population of 86,110 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Duluth has 1,302,882 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Duluth 16 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Duluth is less populated than New Hampshire.
Duluth has a population of 86,110 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Duluth has 1,302,882 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Duluth 16 times less populated than New Hampshire.