On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Killeen, Texas
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Killeen, Texas has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Killeen, Texas's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 37°C/99°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Killeen, Texas . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Killeen, Texas has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Killeen, Texas. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Killeen, Texas has an average annual rainfall of 968mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is drier than Killeen, Texas's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 140mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 1,654 miles (2,662km) north east of Killeen, Texas.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Killeen, Texas.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Killeen, Texas. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 1,181 miles (1,901km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Killeen, Texas. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 835 miles (1,343km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Killeen, Texas.
The midpoint of Killeen, Texas is approximately 1,654 miles (2,662km) south west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Killeen, Texas is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Killeen, Texas is further west by approximately 1,181 miles (1,901km).
No, Killeen, Texas is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Killeen, Texas is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Killeen, Texas is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Killeen, Texas is further south by approximately 835 miles (1,343km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Killeen.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Killeen has a population of 140,806
which means that New Hampshire has 1,248,186 more people than Killeen.
That makes New Hampshire 10 times more populated than Killeen.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Killeen.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Killeen has a population of 140,806
which means that New Hampshire has 1,248,186 more people than Killeen.
That makes New Hampshire 10 times more populated than Killeen.
No, Killeen is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Killeen has a population of 140,806 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Killeen has 1,248,186 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Killeen 10 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Killeen is less populated than New Hampshire.
Killeen has a population of 140,806 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Killeen has 1,248,186 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Killeen 10 times less populated than New Hampshire.