On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Lincoln, Nebraska
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Lincoln, Nebraska has an average temperature of 11°C/52°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Lincoln, Nebraska's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 32°C/90°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Lincoln, Nebraska . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Lincoln, Nebraska has an average minimum temperature of 5°C/41°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Lincoln, Nebraska. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Lincoln, Nebraska has an average annual rainfall of 862mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is drier than Lincoln, Nebraska's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 159mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 1,294 miles (2,083km) east of Lincoln, Nebraska.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Lincoln, Nebraska.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Lincoln, Nebraska. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 1,240 miles (1,996km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Lincoln, Nebraska. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 165 miles (266km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Lincoln, Nebraska.
The midpoint of Lincoln, Nebraska is approximately 1,294 miles (2,083km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Lincoln, Nebraska is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Lincoln, Nebraska is further west by approximately 1,240 miles (1,996km).
No, Lincoln, Nebraska is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Lincoln, Nebraska is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Lincoln, Nebraska is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Lincoln, Nebraska is further south by approximately 165 miles (266km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Lincoln.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Lincoln has a population of 277,348
which means that New Hampshire has 1,111,644 more people than Lincoln.
That makes New Hampshire 5 times more populated than Lincoln.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Lincoln.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Lincoln has a population of 277,348
which means that New Hampshire has 1,111,644 more people than Lincoln.
That makes New Hampshire 5 times more populated than Lincoln.
No, Lincoln is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Lincoln has a population of 277,348 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Lincoln has 1,111,644 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Lincoln 5 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Lincoln is less populated than New Hampshire.
Lincoln has a population of 277,348 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Lincoln has 1,111,644 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Lincoln 5 times less populated than New Hampshire.