On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Nampa, Idaho
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Nampa, Idaho has an average temperature of 12°C/54°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Nampa, Idaho's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Nampa, Idaho . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Nampa, Idaho has an average minimum temperature of 6°C/43°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Nampa, Idaho. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Nampa, Idaho has an average annual rainfall of 339mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is wetter than Nampa, Idaho's wettest month (March, with an average monthly rainfall of 46mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 2,232 miles (3,592km) east of Nampa, Idaho.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Nampa, Idaho.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Nampa, Idaho. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 2,275 miles (3,661km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further north than Nampa, Idaho.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further south than Nampa, Idaho. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further south by approximately 24 miles (39km).
The midpoint of Nampa, Idaho is approximately 2,232 miles (3,592km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Nampa, Idaho is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Nampa, Idaho is further west by approximately 2,275 miles (3,661km).
No, Nampa, Idaho is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Nampa, Idaho is further north than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Nampa, Idaho is further north by approximately 24 miles (39km).
No, Nampa, Idaho is not further south than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Nampa.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Nampa has a population of 89,839
which means that New Hampshire has 1,299,153 more people than Nampa.
That makes New Hampshire 16 times more populated than Nampa.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Nampa.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Nampa has a population of 89,839
which means that New Hampshire has 1,299,153 more people than Nampa.
That makes New Hampshire 16 times more populated than Nampa.
No, Nampa is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Nampa has a population of 89,839 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Nampa has 1,299,153 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Nampa 16 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Nampa is less populated than New Hampshire.
Nampa has a population of 89,839 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Nampa has 1,299,153 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Nampa 16 times less populated than New Hampshire.