On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States is hotter than
Rapid City, South Dakota
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Rapid City, South Dakota has an average temperature of 6°C/43°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is hotter than Rapid City, South Dakota's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 28°C/82°F).
On average across the year, no, New Hampshire, United States is not colder than Rapid City, South Dakota . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Rapid City, South Dakota has an average minimum temperature of -2°C/28°F.
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 1,575 miles (2,534km) east of Rapid City, South Dakota.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Rapid City, South Dakota.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Rapid City, South Dakota. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 1,608 miles (2,588km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further north than Rapid City, South Dakota.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further south than Rapid City, South Dakota. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further south by approximately 62 miles (99km).
The midpoint of Rapid City, South Dakota is approximately 1,575 miles (2,534km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Rapid City, South Dakota is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Rapid City, South Dakota is further west by approximately 1,608 miles (2,588km).
No, Rapid City, South Dakota is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Rapid City, South Dakota is further north than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Rapid City, South Dakota is further north by approximately 62 miles (99km).
No, Rapid City, South Dakota is not further south than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Rapid City.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Rapid City has a population of 73,569
which means that New Hampshire has 1,315,423 more people than Rapid City.
That makes New Hampshire 19 times more populated than Rapid City.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Rapid City.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Rapid City has a population of 73,569
which means that New Hampshire has 1,315,423 more people than Rapid City.
That makes New Hampshire 19 times more populated than Rapid City.
No, Rapid City is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Rapid City has a population of 73,569 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Rapid City has 1,315,423 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Rapid City 19 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Rapid City is less populated than New Hampshire.
Rapid City has a population of 73,569 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Rapid City has 1,315,423 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Rapid City 19 times less populated than New Hampshire.