On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Redlands, California
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Redlands, California has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Redlands, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Redlands, California . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Redlands, California has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Redlands, California. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Redlands, California has an average annual rainfall of 280mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is wetter than Redlands, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 2,508 miles (4,037km) east of Redlands, California.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Redlands, California.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Redlands, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 2,121 miles (3,413km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Redlands, California. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 631 miles (1,016km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Redlands, California.
The midpoint of Redlands, California is approximately 2,508 miles (4,037km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Redlands, California is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Redlands, California is further west by approximately 2,121 miles (3,413km).
No, Redlands, California is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Redlands, California is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Redlands, California is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Redlands, California is further south by approximately 631 miles (1,016km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Redlands.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Redlands has a population of 71,035
which means that New Hampshire has 1,317,957 more people than Redlands.
That makes New Hampshire 20 times more populated than Redlands.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Redlands.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Redlands has a population of 71,035
which means that New Hampshire has 1,317,957 more people than Redlands.
That makes New Hampshire 20 times more populated than Redlands.
No, Redlands is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Redlands has a population of 71,035 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Redlands has 1,317,957 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Redlands 20 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Redlands is less populated than New Hampshire.
Redlands has a population of 71,035 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Redlands has 1,317,957 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Redlands 20 times less populated than New Hampshire.