On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States is hotter than
Rutland, Vermont
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Rutland, Vermont has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is hotter than Rutland, Vermont's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 27°C/81°F).
On average across the year, no, New Hampshire, United States is not colder than Rutland, Vermont . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Rutland, Vermont has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Rutland, Vermont. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Rutland, Vermont has an average annual rainfall of 1070mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is wetter than Rutland, Vermont's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 118mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 76 miles (122km) east of Rutland, Vermont.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Rutland, Vermont.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Rutland, Vermont. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 71 miles (114km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further north than Rutland, Vermont.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further south than Rutland, Vermont. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further south by approximately 29 miles (46km).
The midpoint of Rutland, Vermont is approximately 76 miles (122km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Rutland, Vermont is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Rutland, Vermont is further west by approximately 71 miles (114km).
No, Rutland, Vermont is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Rutland, Vermont is further north than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Rutland, Vermont is further north by approximately 29 miles (46km).
No, Rutland, Vermont is not further south than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Rutland.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Rutland has a population of 15,824
which means that New Hampshire has 1,373,168 more people than Rutland.
That makes New Hampshire 88 times more populated than Rutland.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Rutland.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Rutland has a population of 15,824
which means that New Hampshire has 1,373,168 more people than Rutland.
That makes New Hampshire 88 times more populated than Rutland.
No, Rutland is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Rutland has a population of 15,824 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Rutland has 1,373,168 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Rutland 88 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Rutland is less populated than New Hampshire.
Rutland has a population of 15,824 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Rutland has 1,373,168 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Rutland 88 times less populated than New Hampshire.