On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Tulsa, Oklahoma
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Tulsa, Oklahoma has an average temperature of 17°C/63°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than Tulsa, Oklahoma's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Tulsa, Oklahoma . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Tulsa, Oklahoma has an average minimum temperature of 11°C/52°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Tulsa, Oklahoma. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Tulsa, Oklahoma has an average annual rainfall of 1111mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is drier than Tulsa, Oklahoma's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 165mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 1,381 miles (2,222km) east of Tulsa, Oklahoma.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Tulsa, Oklahoma. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 1,158 miles (1,864km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Tulsa, Oklahoma. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 487 miles (783km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Tulsa, Oklahoma.
The midpoint of Tulsa, Oklahoma is approximately 1,381 miles (2,222km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Tulsa, Oklahoma is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Tulsa, Oklahoma is further west by approximately 1,158 miles (1,864km).
No, Tulsa, Oklahoma is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Tulsa, Oklahoma is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Tulsa, Oklahoma is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Tulsa, Oklahoma is further south by approximately 487 miles (783km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Tulsa.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Tulsa has a population of 403,505
which means that New Hampshire has 985,487 more people than Tulsa.
That makes New Hampshire 3 times more populated than Tulsa.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Tulsa.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Tulsa has a population of 403,505
which means that New Hampshire has 985,487 more people than Tulsa.
That makes New Hampshire 3 times more populated than Tulsa.
No, Tulsa is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Tulsa has a population of 403,505 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Tulsa has 985,487 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Tulsa 3 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Tulsa is less populated than New Hampshire.
Tulsa has a population of 403,505 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Tulsa has 985,487 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Tulsa 3 times less populated than New Hampshire.