On average across the year,
New Hampshire, United States is approximately as hot as
Waukegan, Illinois
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Waukegan, Illinois has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is hotter than Waukegan, Illinois's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 28°C/82°F).
On average across the year, New Hampshire, United States is approximately as cold as Waukegan, Illinois . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Waukegan, Illinois has an average minimum temperature of 4°C/39°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Waukegan, Illinois. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Waukegan, Illinois has an average annual rainfall of 1133mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is drier than Waukegan, Illinois's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 143mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 826 miles (1,329km) east of Waukegan, Illinois.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Waukegan, Illinois.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Waukegan, Illinois. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 815 miles (1,312km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Waukegan, Illinois. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 57 miles (92km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Waukegan, Illinois.
The midpoint of Waukegan, Illinois is approximately 826 miles (1,329km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Waukegan, Illinois is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Waukegan, Illinois is further west by approximately 815 miles (1,312km).
No, Waukegan, Illinois is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Waukegan, Illinois is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Waukegan, Illinois is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Waukegan, Illinois is further south by approximately 57 miles (92km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Waukegan.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Waukegan has a population of 88,475
which means that New Hampshire has 1,300,517 more people than Waukegan.
That makes New Hampshire 16 times more populated than Waukegan.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Waukegan.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Waukegan has a population of 88,475
which means that New Hampshire has 1,300,517 more people than Waukegan.
That makes New Hampshire 16 times more populated than Waukegan.
No, Waukegan is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Waukegan has a population of 88,475 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Waukegan has 1,300,517 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Waukegan 16 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Waukegan is less populated than New Hampshire.
Waukegan has a population of 88,475 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Waukegan has 1,300,517 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Waukegan 16 times less populated than New Hampshire.